Being part of the social justice culture or the “stay woke” culture, I usually thought that the main purposes were to:
1) Unlearn what was taught to you
2) Learn what was never taught to you
3) Educate those around you with the knowledge you have
Being part of the social justice culture or the “stay woke” culture, I usually thought that the main purposes were to:
1) Unlearn what was taught to you
2) Learn what was never taught to you
3) Educate those around you with the knowledge you have
Doja Cat @ Schiaparelli covered in 30,000 Crystals
Haute Couture Week Paris SS23
How she look like a shellfish with a severe allergic reaction to shellfish at the same time??
Whats crazy about this Tumblr Live thing is that Kik uses the exact same streaming platform
Why does Tumblr need livestreaming??
Link to full report (845 pages)
“This Report supplies an immense volume of information and testimony assembled through the Select Committee’s investigation, including information obtained following litigation in Federal district and appellate courts, as well as in the U.S. Supreme Court. Based upon this assembled evidence, the Committee has reached a series of specific findings, including the following:
[1] Beginning election night and continuing through January 6th and thereafter, Donald Trump purposely disseminated false allegations of fraud related to the 2020 Presidential election in order to aid his effort to overturn the election and for purposes of soliciting contributions. These false claims provoked his supporters to violence on January 6th.
[2] Knowing that he and his supporters had lost dozens of election lawsuits, and despite his own senior advisors refuting his election fraud claims and urging him to concede his election loss, Donald Trump refused to accept the lawful result of the 2020 election. Rather than honor his constitutional obligation to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” President Trump instead plotted to overturn the election outcome.
[3] Despite knowing that such an action would be illegal, and that no State had or would submit an altered electoral slate, Donald Trump corruptly pressured Vice President Mike Pence to refuse to count electoral votes during Congress’s joint session on January 6th.
[4] Donald Trump sought to corrupt the U.S. Department of Justice by attempting to enlist Department officials to make purposely false statements and thereby aid his effort to overturn the Presidential election. After that effort failed, Donald Trump offered the position of Acting Attorney General to Jeff Clark knowing that Clark intended to disseminate false information aimed at overturning the election.
[5] Without any evidentiary basis and contrary to State and Federal law, Donald Trump unlawfully pressured State officials and legislators to change the results of the election in their States.
[6] Donald Trump oversaw an effort to obtain and transmit false electoral certificates to Congress and the National Archives.
[7] Donald Trump pressured Members of Congress to object to valid slates of electors from several States.
[8] Donald Trump purposely verified false information filed in Federal court.
[9] Based on false allegations that the election was stolen, Donald Trump summoned tens of thousands of supporters to Washington for January 6th. Although these supporters were angry and some were armed, Donald Trump instructed them to march to the Capitol on January 6th to “take back” their country.
[10] Knowing that a violent attack on the Capitol was underway and knowing that his words would incite further violence, Donald Trump purposely sent a social media message publicly condemning Vice President Pence at 2:24 p.m. on January 6th.
[11] Knowing that violence was underway at the Capitol, and despite his duty to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed, Donald Trump refused repeated requests over a multiple hour period that he instruct his violent supporters to disperse and leave the Capitol, and instead watched the violent attack unfold on television. This failure to act perpetuated the violence at the Capitol and obstructed Congress’s proceeding to count electoral votes.
[12] Each of these actions by Donald Trump was taken in support of a multi-part conspiracy to overturn the lawful results of the 2020 Presidential election.
[13] The intelligence community and law enforcement agencies did successfully detect the planning for potential violence on January 6th, including planning specifically by the Proud Boys and Oath Keeper militia groups who ultimately led the attack on the Capitol. As January 6th approached, the intelligence specifically identified the potential for violence at the U.S. Capitol. This intelligence was shared within the executive branch, including with the Secret Service and the President’s National Security Council.
[14] Intelligence gathered in advance of January 6th did not support a conclusion that Antifa or other left-wing groups would likely engage in a violent counter-demonstration, or attack Trump supporters on January 6th. Indeed, intelligence from January 5th indicated that some left-wing groups were instructing their members to “stay at home” and not attend on January 6th.20 Ultimately, none of these groups was involved to any material extent with the attack on the Capitol on January 6th.
[15] Neither the intelligence community nor law enforcement obtained intelligence in advance of January 6th on the full extent of the ongoing planning by President Trump, John Eastman, Rudolph Giuliani and their associates to overturn the certified election results. Such agencies apparently did not (and potentially could not) anticipate the provocation President Trump would offer the crowd in his Ellipse speech, that President Trump would “spontaneously” instruct the crowd to march to the Capitol, that President Trump would exacerbate the violent riot by sending his 2:24 p.m. tweet condemning Vice President Pence, or the full scale of the violence and lawlessness that would ensue. Nor did law enforcement anticipate that President Trump would refuse to direct his supporters to leave the Capitol once violence began. No intelligence community advance analysis predicted exactly how President Trump would behave; no such analysis recognized the full scale and extent of the threat to the Capitol on January 6th.
[16] Hundreds of Capitol and DC Metropolitan police officers performed their duties bravely on January 6th, and America owes those individuals immense gratitude for their courage in the defense of Congress and our Constitution. Without their bravery, January 6th would have been far worse. Although certain members of the Capitol Police leadership regarded their approach to January 6th as “all hands on deck,” the Capitol Police leadership did not have sufficient assets in place to address the violent and lawless crowd.21 Capitol Police leadership did not anticipate the scale of the violence that would ensue after President Trump instructed tens of thousands of his supporters in the Ellipse crowd to march to the Capitol, and then tweeted at 2:24 p.m. Although Chief Steven Sund raised the idea of National Guard support, the Capitol Police Board did not request Guard assistance prior to January 6th. The Metropolitan Police took an even more proactive approach to January 6th, and deployed roughly 800 officers, including responding to the emergency calls for help at the Capitol. Rioters still managed to break their line in certain locations, when the crowd surged forward in the immediate aftermath of Donald Trump’s 2:24 p.m. tweet. The Department of Justice readied a group of Federal agents at Quantico and in the District of Columbia, anticipating that January 6th could become violent, and then deployed those agents once it became clear that police at the Capitol were overwhelmed. Agents from the Department of Homeland Security were also deployed to assist.
[17] President Trump had authority and responsibility to direct deployment of the National Guard in the District of Columbia, but never gave any order to deploy the National Guard on January 6th or on any other day. Nor did he instruct any Federal law enforcement agency to assist. Because the authority to deploy the National Guard had been delegated to the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense could, and ultimately did deploy the Guard. Although evidence identifies a likely miscommunication between members of the civilian leadership in the Department of Defense impacting the timing of deployment, the Committee has found no evidence that the Department of Defense intentionally delayed deployment of the National Guard. The Select Committee recognizes that some at the Department had genuine concerns, counseling caution, that President Trump might give an illegal order to use the military in support of his efforts to overturn the election.”
Since when did Tumblr have a livestreaming service???
She saw her moment and got glossed up for it
Why Adidas dis not terminate Kanye’s contract earlier for his Anti-Black remarks is very clear…
Non-Black folks do not want to risk calling out a Black person on Black experiences.
That’s it.
When a Black person (especially a popular celebrity) makes a remark that critiques his own race, what’s the protocol behind that?
When Non-Black folks sees a Black person speak on Black experiences, they stay out of it for two reasons:
- They’re met with backlash because they’re not Black; “Stay in your lane, this is a Black discussion.”
- Who are they to say that a Black person is incorrect/inaccurate about Black topics? They don’t know about the Black experience to even have an opinion, let alone correct us.
So when Adidas sees Kanye West making anti-Black remarks, being a company from Germany, they don’t know how to respond to a Black person speaking his opinion on Black history, experiences and issues in America.
They were nervous that Black folks will call out Adidas, a European company, for intervening in a Black discussion that has nothing to do with them. So they stood out of it and stood quiet.
Kanye’s recent remarks was 110% anti-semantic. Period. There is no way to spin it, defend it, and change the perspective without sounding like an anti-semantic. It was straight hate. Kanye deserved what was coming to him. I just wish he faced his consequences earlier.
The moment he said “Slavery is a choice” was the best time to cut him loose. The anti-semantic remarks was the next best time to cut him off and thankfully he’s getting punished after years of bullshit.
Why Adidas dis not terminate Kanye’s contract earlier for his Anti-Black remarks is very clear…
Non-Black folks do not want to risk calling out a Black person on Black experiences.
That’s it.
When a Black person (especially a popular celebrity) makes a remark that critiques his own race, what’s the protocol behind that?
When Non-Black folks sees a Black person speak on Black experiences, they stay out of it for two reasons:
So when Adidas sees Kanye West making anti-Black remarks, being a company from Germany, they don’t know how to respond to a Black person speaking his opinion on Black history, experiences and issues in America.
They were nervous that Black folks will call out Adidas, a European company, for intervening in a Black discussion that has nothing to do with them. So they stood out of it and stood quiet.
Why Adidas dis not terminate Kanye’s contract earlier for his Anti-Black remarks is very clear…
That’s it.
I swear, this is the perfect example of perfect is the enemy of good.
If I recall correctly, the Pell program is pre-dominately Black and Brown students. Which means that we’re going to have a lot of Black and Brown folks taking advantage of $20,000 in student loan forgiveness. How do you twist this into a racial issue?
Biden literally just helped Black and Brown students without announcing that he’s helping Black and Brown students with their debt, which would’ve been met with political backlash and a heavier push back from Republicans.
Remember, this was a promise from Democrats. They delivered. It’s not much, but it’s something. Republicans was against this policy. They didn’t want to forgive a single penny of your debt, yet Biden still pulled through.
This is progress, yall! Sure it’s not a lot, but $10K-20K is a huge relief for a lot of Americans today. How do you sit there and say: “Yeahhh, that’s great, but y’all could’ve done better?”
Okay, sure, with the US government being outsized by fucking neo-nazis and domestic-terrorist apologists, I’m pretty sure Biden could’ve done better than $20K.
I’ll be straight up…
Nina Turner is a Black woman. So she’s going to see things from a Black woman’s perspective:
A) Black women, by average, have more student loan debt that Black men and White people
B) Black women make less money than Black men and White people, making their situation more dire
C) On top of that, Black women, despite the situation, STILL go to college more than Black men, which nets them more debt collectively.
She’s right altogether, and her experiences aren’t to be dismissed but to take groundbreaking act and twist it into “This aint gonna help Black Women though!” is straight up selfish and ignores that Black women are still benefiting from this, especially $20K in forgiveness. People would KILL for that kind of forgiveness, but she want’s to make an enemy out of someone that’s doing good and trying to meet a promise he made during the 2020 campaign.
Just because a White person does something good for Black and Brown folks doesn’t mean they have this underlying racist agenda. Grow the fuck up.
I swear, this is the perfect example of perfect is the enemy of good.
If I recall correctly, the Pell program is pre-dominately Black and Brown students. Which means that we’re going to have a lot of Black and Brown folks taking advantage of $20,000 in student loan forgiveness. How do you twist this into a racial issue?
Biden literally just helped Black and Brown students without announcing that he’s helping Black and Brown students with their debt, which would’ve been met with political backlash and a heavier push back from Republicans.
Remember, this was a promise from Democrats. They delivered. It’s not much, but it’s something. Republicans was against this policy. They didn’t want to forgive a single penny of your debt, yet Biden still pulled through.
This is progress, yall! Sure it’s not a lot, but $10K-20K is a huge relief for a lot of Americans today. How do you sit there and say: “Yeahhh, that’s great, but y’all could’ve done better?”
Okay, sure, with the US government being outsized by fucking neo-nazis and domestic-terrorist apologists, I’m pretty sure Biden could’ve done better than $20K.
So what’s yall opinion on this because yikes…